Skip to main content

State Of The Union

Despite Southlandish's forebodings I will not be laying waste to his musings on the state of the USMNT. Indeed, if you have watched the last six months worth of US play you should come up with something like the pessimism voiced in his post.

However, I do offer some hopeful caveats.

1) The fact we haven't played a meaningful match in some time can mask real development. The last competitive match we played was last July 5th in the Copa, and even that was played with a "B" team of mostly MLS players. You have to go back to the Gold Cup final against Mexico (June 24th, 2007) for the last time the "A" team played for anything.

Friendlies play their role, and they are certainly fun for the fans, but you can read way too much into them for good or ill. I was in the crowd that saw the US beat Argentina 1-0 in a friendly back in 1999. How much did that really tell us about the state of American soccer? Not a whole hell of a lot. The next competitive matches we played (which were not until the next year admittedly) were a tie at Guatemala and a loss at Costa Rica, sides no one has ever confused for Argentina.

2) I will not be caught selling US talent short...not until I see them in real matches. Our main problem, projecting forward here, is the dearth of options at forward. McBride's international retirement has been a huge blow to this team, who relied so heavily on McBride's workrate and his ability to play with his back to goal. There is no player in the US pool who can play that way, and it has taken far too long for the US coaches to realize this. Brian Ching is a solid pro who has a McBride style game, but it seems unlikely he will ever enjoy the same kind of success as he simply isn't as fearless as McBride. (The same goes for Kenny Cooper.)

None of the other options, especially the lengthy attempt to get Eddie Johnson going, is particularly promising. To my mind the best approach would be to put a poacher like Taylor Twellman or a Chris Rolfe, neither of whom will ever dazzle anyone with their skill, in there every day, and allow our midfield to run, run, run. Between Donovan, Adu, Beasley, Bradley, Dempsey, and, if he ever gets healthy, Convey, we should be able to cause enough trouble for opposing defenses that a Twellman (or a Rolfe) should be able to pick up the junk.

The desire to field a classic striker has repeatedly tempted US coaches to put Donovan up top, which only works against inferior opponents. If we simply accepted that most of our offense is going to come from midfield, the standard of US play would improve dramatically.

To my mind, with this player pool, we should be playing a 4-5-1, featuring a midfield of Donovan & Dempsey in the middle, with Adu and Beasley on the wings, and Bradley (or Ricardo Clark) slotting behind as a holding midfielder. All five of those players have to ability to pressure defenses, so that a lone Twellman or Rolfe up top wouldn't be expected to create chances themselves.

3) Southlandish is right in saying the US team seems like it cannot pick a style and stick with it. Part of that has to do with the vagaries of who is available in the player pool, but most of it has to do with the transition from Arena to Bradley. Both have the tendency of bringing in a lot of players for a look see, but Bradley seems slower to make final judgements than Arena. For that reason we have had extended periods of experimentation in the US side, which has made for some uneven play and a lack of focus. Of course, the goal is to be ready for World Cup qualifying, so we will get a better feel for this team starting the 15th.

Actually, playing a minnow like Barbados might not tell us much either, but you may see the US pick a style at least.

Comments

Southlandish said…
Thanks for the extended post. I definitely think you are on to something with the 4-5-1.
Rich Horton said…
To my mind the 4-5-1 seems like a no brainer...but it has a reputation for being defensive, and there was the debacle when Sampson installed it right before the World Cup back in '98. American soccer has long memories about such things. Hell, if they want to keep second guessers off their back, they should list Donovan as a forward but tell him to play central midfield.

Problem solved.

Popular posts from this blog

Early Thoughts on City 2025

There are few things harder to keep track of than an MLS side in their off-season, at least for me. Despite the fact it takes place roughly during the time the MLB Hot Stove season is in full swing, it is nowhere near as easy to follow along with as baseball. Part of it is how disconnected MLS is with the international soccer calendar. St. Louis City SC is still digesting the moves it made last summer even though those players have already played important games for the club. It is all weird and disjointed, and I always feel like I am playing catch-up. Happily, the moves made in the off-season this year were not numerous.  German Timo Baumgartl comes over from Europe as an option at center back, which is good because that was a position that was a little rocky for City last season. Given his own troubles over the last few seasons (cancer and uneven play in the aftermath of that), a spell with City can give Baumgartl a chance to have a re-set. Given his pedigree and the fact City si...

Blues Beat Bugbear

 The St. Louis Blues have not had many out-of-character results so far this season. For the most part they have been handling the teams they usually handle and doing nothing against the teams that seem to always have their number. There is some solace to be had just knowing that you are going to probably beat Calgary, and will probably lose to Columbus, just as the sun will most likely rise in the East tomorrow. Granted that isn't an ideal set of affairs for a sports team, but Blues fans have learned to take what they can get. Which is why it is fair to say last night's victory over Utah was unusual. The Blues do not play well against that collection of players. Ever. So, any victory would be noteworthy in this matchup, but the resilience they showed last night was an added bonus. The Blues still have crappy puck luck, but last night they didn't let it get them down and, miracle of miracles, the puck luck evened out for the game. For a change the PK wasn't always runnin...

A Note of Optimism About the Note

 If you have been trying to watch the St. Louis Blues attempt to play hockey of late it would be hard to believe the word optimism could ever be in play. The losses continue relentlessly, often in the "never in the game" style, but increasingly in a "lose from winning position" flair which is enough to make someone turn on the news for an upbeat change of pace. (Wow, plane crashes and LUNACY!) This team still can't score with the regularity needed to win consistently in this league. The coaching staff knows they have precious few natural goal scorers (one is precious few), so they attempt to make up for it by getting what I call "process" goals, i.e. goals scored by virtue of constant pressure, crazy bounces, accidental deflections, etc. Basically, any goal you can get from a player who doesn't have the knack for scoring them on their own. The Blues are something like zero for their last 12-15 breakaway chances, and zero for their last 25-30 2 on 1...