Skip to main content

March Madness

Southlandish here. Following up on The Iconic Midwesterner's lament about this year's tourney, I've been thinking about a new tournament format. I have a little time to kill before by Illini tip-off on the way to their early exit.

I wish the NCAA would just take the FA Cup (English Football) approach and say everyone is in. There are 336 Division I schools, I think. You add three more rounds to the tourney. Get rid of those silly damned conference tourneys, which pervert everything by making the winner the automatic bid and shortening the regular season conference schedules. There is no excuse for Big Ten teams not to play each conference member home and away, which leads to some of the bitching about the strength of schedule come seeding time.

You give 176 teams bids into the first full bracket round of 256 and the other 160 bottom-feeders have a one round play in game to fill in the balance of 80 spots. Then you play out eight rounds. Every year you are going to end up with some REAL Cinderella stories. Really shitty teams who win four games and make the round of 32. All the Majors have all their teams in so they should be happy and they should all easily win their first two or three games before running into the big boys.

Sure there is still going to be bitching about seeds but the bottom line is that everyone is ultimately in control of their own destiny and no legitimate top 50 team is going to play anyone but cupcakes for their first three games. If you're Illinois and you lose your second game to 10-20 LaSalle, you earned your disgrace. Stop whining.

It would be one helluva tournament and truly MARCH Madness because Selection Sunday is going to have to be bumped to the first Sunday in March and the three extra games mean that the whole month is going to be about the NCAA Tourney. A month of mania works for the World Cup. I can't believe it wouldn't be the same for the NCAA.

As for the NIT being eliminated, again referring to European football, re-package (and rename it) it as a kind of Champions League that runs through the first half of the next season. There are 32 Division I conferences. Make it a five round tourney of the previous year champs starting early in the season and wrapping up just as the conference schedules start. That would give you seven weeks or so to play it out. Only 8 teams are even going to be playing a third game so it isn't intrusive on team scheduling, especially since we already see large disparities in games played because of scheduling and early season tournaments. I think Indiana played 4 fewer games than Illinois this year. An ESPN could hype the hell out of it. Look what they already do with the Rivalry Weeks.

It's fun to fantasize about this stuff.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Early Thoughts on City 2025

There are few things harder to keep track of than an MLS side in their off-season, at least for me. Despite the fact it takes place roughly during the time the MLB Hot Stove season is in full swing, it is nowhere near as easy to follow along with as baseball. Part of it is how disconnected MLS is with the international soccer calendar. St. Louis City SC is still digesting the moves it made last summer even though those players have already played important games for the club. It is all weird and disjointed, and I always feel like I am playing catch-up. Happily, the moves made in the off-season this year were not numerous.  German Timo Baumgartl comes over from Europe as an option at center back, which is good because that was a position that was a little rocky for City last season. Given his own troubles over the last few seasons (cancer and uneven play in the aftermath of that), a spell with City can give Baumgartl a chance to have a re-set. Given his pedigree and the fact City si...

Blues Fall Off a Cliff

 Hockey seasons will have their ups and downs. For whatever reason, be it injuries, a challenging schedule, an inexplicable loss of form, it is difficult for teams to maintain a good level of compete for an entire season. The good teams just limit their funks. The St. Louis Blues, however, are not a good team. They are a poor team, and poor teams sink under the weight of "here we go again" night after night.  I will admit I only watched the first two periods of last night's 5-0 loss to a Colorado team that had been scuffling of late. Two periods were more than enough to get the gist of it. It was also enough to lead me to a diagnosis as to what ails the team. It isn't that they are young and are going through growing pains. No, the reason the Blues are so bad is that the veterans who are being paid to be the backbone of this team are not doing their jobs. I'm talking about Schenn, Buchnevich, Faulk, and even Binnington and Parayko. Over $30M of the salary cap is b...

A Note of Optimism About the Note

 If you have been trying to watch the St. Louis Blues attempt to play hockey of late it would be hard to believe the word optimism could ever be in play. The losses continue relentlessly, often in the "never in the game" style, but increasingly in a "lose from winning position" flair which is enough to make someone turn on the news for an upbeat change of pace. (Wow, plane crashes and LUNACY!) This team still can't score with the regularity needed to win consistently in this league. The coaching staff knows they have precious few natural goal scorers (one is precious few), so they attempt to make up for it by getting what I call "process" goals, i.e. goals scored by virtue of constant pressure, crazy bounces, accidental deflections, etc. Basically, any goal you can get from a player who doesn't have the knack for scoring them on their own. The Blues are something like zero for their last 12-15 breakaway chances, and zero for their last 25-30 2 on 1...