Skip to main content

Juan Gone?

By
I know it is nothing to get too excited about, after all it is only Juan Encarnacion, but the Tony & Juan show seems to be drawing to a close.

Tony La Russa is right to be upset with Juan Encarnacion’s episodes of non-hustle, and I applaud the manager for doing something about it. This isn’t about Juan E’s style; I’ve defended him in the past, because he gives the impression that he’s coasting in the outfield, when in fact (last season) he had the best zone rating of any full-time right fielder in MLB. In other words, I don’t care how he looks, as long as he’s getting to the balls he’s supposed to catch. But this year Juan’s zone rating has declined. It isn’t bad; he’d rank about 7th in the NL in zone rating by RF. But his concentration isn’t what it should be. He’s had some glaring instances of lax hustle, in the field and on the bases. This is a team fighting to stay alive, and Encarnacion just doesn’t seem locked in.

...

As for trading Encarnacion… I don’t know how all of this is going to go down. The team is off Monday; La Russa is visiting his family in Oakland before rejoining the team in Milwaukee on Tuesday. La Russa does not take kindly to players ripping him in the paper. Maybe La Russa tells Walt Jocketty: enough, get rid of the guy. Or maybe Tony uses this little blow-up as a reason to really clear the air, and motivate Encarnacion. The Cardinals must proceed with caution. They have LH outfield bats in Ankiel, Jim Edmonds and Chris Duncan. But Duncan is really struggling now, Edmonds doesn’t play against all LH pitchers, and if you take Encarnacion out of the mix you have only two RH bats in the OF in So Taguchi and Ryan Ludwick.

Trying to move Encarnacion now would be a player dump pure and simple, and I wonder if you could get anything interesting in return. Still it might be preferable to him sitting on the bench and bitching to the Post-Dispatch. Given the salary owed him next season I don't think there would be much difficulty getting him through waivers, but who in the playoff chase needs an extra alright-not-great bat? Boston likes to have plenty of spare parts, but this year?

As fr being all that worried about the right handed at bats left in the Cards lineup without Juan around, I wouldn't be. Between Pujols, Rolen and Ludwick we should be alright, and it isn't as if we are doing fabulously against lefties anyway. La Russa's all righty lineups against southpaws have been just as feeble as any otehr lineup, so why worry about it? I'd rather have Duncan and Ankiel get all the bats against left-handers that they can. If they are gonna be everyday players, then let them play everyday.

And who knows, if you could move Encarnacion for a useful bullpen arm that could be an actual help this season. (I know that scenario seems unlikely.)

I've always been underwhelmed by Encarnacion for some reason, so his leaving would hardly register for me.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Note of Optimism About the Note

By
 If you have been trying to watch the St. Louis Blues attempt to play hockey of late it would be hard to believe the word optimism could ever be in play. The losses continue relentlessly, often in the "never in the game" style, but increasingly in a "lose from winning position" flair which is enough to make someone turn on the news for an upbeat change of pace. (Wow, plane crashes and LUNACY!) This team still can't score with the regularity needed to win consistently in this league. The coaching staff knows they have precious few natural goal scorers (one is precious few), so they attempt to make up for it by getting what I call "process" goals, i.e. goals scored by virtue of constant pressure, crazy bounces, accidental deflections, etc. Basically, any goal you can get from a player who doesn't have the knack for scoring them on their own. The Blues are something like zero for their last 12-15 breakaway chances, and zero for their last 25-30 2 on 1...
Post a Comment
Read more

Matt Damon: "James Bond Should Be A Wuss, Like Me."

By
Alright, maybe Damon didn't say that exactly, but he might as well have : Hollywood star Matt Damon has dismissed James Bond as being stuck in the past. The actor, who appears in the Bourne thrillers, said: "The Bond character will always be anchored in the 1960s and in the values of the 1960s." The suave spy was "so anachronistic when you put it in the world we live in today", he said, but added that Bourne was no better or worse than Bond. Damon was speaking in London, where The Bourne Ultimatum, the third film in the franchise, is having its UK premiere. "Bond is an imperialist and a misogynist who kills people and laughs about it, and drinks Martinis and cracks jokes," he told reporters. "Bourne is a serial monogamist whose girlfriend is dead and he does nothing but think about her." Bourne mooning over his dead girlfriend is something we should be excited to see? Give me a break. At least Bond lives in a world where it is killed or be ki...
5 comments
Read more

Blues Beat Bugbear

By
 The St. Louis Blues have not had many out-of-character results so far this season. For the most part they have been handling the teams they usually handle and doing nothing against the teams that seem to always have their number. There is some solace to be had just knowing that you are going to probably beat Calgary, and will probably lose to Columbus, just as the sun will most likely rise in the East tomorrow. Granted that isn't an ideal set of affairs for a sports team, but Blues fans have learned to take what they can get. Which is why it is fair to say last night's victory over Utah was unusual. The Blues do not play well against that collection of players. Ever. So, any victory would be noteworthy in this matchup, but the resilience they showed last night was an added bonus. The Blues still have crappy puck luck, but last night they didn't let it get them down and, miracle of miracles, the puck luck evened out for the game. For a change the PK wasn't always runnin...
Post a Comment
Read more