Skip to main content

Aussie Tinkering

In case you were wondering, there are indeed rules to Aussie Rules Football. And just as in American Football folks do like to change the rules up a bit.

THE AFL will trial a 20m kick rule during the 2007 pre-season competition in a bid to encourage longer kicking and more contested play.

Players will now have to kick a ball at least 20m for it to be marked, instead of 15, under a law to be introduced during the NAB Cup, which starts on February 23.

In a further modification to be used during the pre-season competition, players will only be prohibited from kicking backwards in their defensive half of the ground.

Players will now be able to kick backwards to a teammate in the forward half of the ground without fear of umpires calling play-on.

Previously players were only allowed to pass backwards in their team's forward 50-metre arc.

...

The AFL hopes extending the distance a kick has to travel before it can be marked will encourage players to boot it longer instead of chipping it short to teammates.

Continued short kicking and possession football has been a blight on the game in recent years, with many fans bemoaning the lack of contested marks in games.

"Player skills in finding targets for a mark under the current 15-metre rule have got better and better in recent years and the trial rule may encourage longer kicking and contested possession," said AFL football operations general manager Adrian Anderson.

"We will examine the impact of the trial rule and whether it increases contested marks, long kicking and contested possession."


I think they may well increase the numbers of contested marks, but I wonder if the quality of play will suffer. Possession play may not be everyone's first impression of Aussie rules (an ill defined melee maybe hits nearer the mark), but it doesn't necessarily follow that the game is less interesting for it. In any event it will be interesting to see the results.


The AFL modified the kicking-backwards rule after several coaches told the league outlawing backwards kicks in the forward half of the ground encouraged teams to flood an opposing side's attack.


This seems like a very sensible rule change. This allows the team in the offensive end to switch the point of attack quickly. Before the defenders could just swarm the player with the ball, who wasn't going to get the ball very far with a hand pass. Too often the best offensive play was to give the ball a boot and pray for a lucky bounce. With this rule in place, over commitment to one side of the pitch would leave room for an easy six on the other. It is about time defenders had to stay on their toes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Early Thoughts on City 2025

There are few things harder to keep track of than an MLS side in their off-season, at least for me. Despite the fact it takes place roughly during the time the MLB Hot Stove season is in full swing, it is nowhere near as easy to follow along with as baseball. Part of it is how disconnected MLS is with the international soccer calendar. St. Louis City SC is still digesting the moves it made last summer even though those players have already played important games for the club. It is all weird and disjointed, and I always feel like I am playing catch-up. Happily, the moves made in the off-season this year were not numerous.  German Timo Baumgartl comes over from Europe as an option at center back, which is good because that was a position that was a little rocky for City last season. Given his own troubles over the last few seasons (cancer and uneven play in the aftermath of that), a spell with City can give Baumgartl a chance to have a re-set. Given his pedigree and the fact City si...

Blues Fall Off a Cliff

 Hockey seasons will have their ups and downs. For whatever reason, be it injuries, a challenging schedule, an inexplicable loss of form, it is difficult for teams to maintain a good level of compete for an entire season. The good teams just limit their funks. The St. Louis Blues, however, are not a good team. They are a poor team, and poor teams sink under the weight of "here we go again" night after night.  I will admit I only watched the first two periods of last night's 5-0 loss to a Colorado team that had been scuffling of late. Two periods were more than enough to get the gist of it. It was also enough to lead me to a diagnosis as to what ails the team. It isn't that they are young and are going through growing pains. No, the reason the Blues are so bad is that the veterans who are being paid to be the backbone of this team are not doing their jobs. I'm talking about Schenn, Buchnevich, Faulk, and even Binnington and Parayko. Over $30M of the salary cap is b...

Blues Beat Bugbear

 The St. Louis Blues have not had many out-of-character results so far this season. For the most part they have been handling the teams they usually handle and doing nothing against the teams that seem to always have their number. There is some solace to be had just knowing that you are going to probably beat Calgary, and will probably lose to Columbus, just as the sun will most likely rise in the East tomorrow. Granted that isn't an ideal set of affairs for a sports team, but Blues fans have learned to take what they can get. Which is why it is fair to say last night's victory over Utah was unusual. The Blues do not play well against that collection of players. Ever. So, any victory would be noteworthy in this matchup, but the resilience they showed last night was an added bonus. The Blues still have crappy puck luck, but last night they didn't let it get them down and, miracle of miracles, the puck luck evened out for the game. For a change the PK wasn't always runnin...